Weighing the Evidence: How Pennsylvania Juries Determine Whether to Impose the Death Penalty

The penalty phase of a death penalty case in Pennsylvania is a crucial part of the legal process. During this phase, the jury must determine whether the defendant should be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. In this blog post, we will explore in very general terms how the penalty phase of a death penalty case is handled in Pennsylvania, including the specific types of aggravating factors and mitigators that the jury considers.

Under Pennsylvania law, the penalty phase of a death penalty case begins after the jury has convicted the defendant of first-degree murder. The prosecution then presents evidence of aggravating factors, which are specific circumstances that make the crime more heinous or worthy of the death penalty. Some examples of aggravating factors in Pennsylvania include the victim being a police officer or a child, the crime being committed during the commission of another felony, and the defendant having a history of violent behavior.

Once the prosecution has presented its evidence of aggravating factors, the defense can present evidence of mitigating factors, which are circumstances that suggest that the defendant should not be sentenced to death. Some examples of mitigating factors in Pennsylvania include the defendant’s age, mental capacity, and lack of prior criminal record.

After hearing the evidence of aggravating and mitigating factors, the jury must determine whether the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors. If the jury determines that the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors, the defendant will be sentenced to death. However, if the jury determines that the mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors, the defendant will be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

It is important to note that under Pennsylvania law, the jury must be unanimous in its decision to impose the death penalty. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, the defendant will be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

In conclusion, the penalty phase of a death penalty case in Pennsylvania is a complex and highly scrutinized process. During this phase, the jury considers evidence of aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the defendant should be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The specific types of aggravating factors and mitigators that the jury considers are outlined by Pennsylvania law, and the jury must reach a unanimous decision in order to impose the death penalty.

Our Clients are entitled to a Bill of Rights which states:

  • Our clients have the right to expect, we will be proactive in communication. You will hear it from us first. We will return all phone calls, texts and emails promptly.
  • Our clients have the right to expect plain speaking, straight shooting. No B. S.
  • Our clients have the right to expect us to do it right the first time, every time.
  • Our clients have the right to expect us to be on time and professionally prepared for all court appearances, and all meetings.
  • Our clients have the right to expect that they will be fully informed at all times.

This is our promise to you. Call today to get us on your side: (717) 657-3900.

PA DUI attorney Justin J. McShane is the President/CEO of The McShane Firm, LLC - Pennsylvania's top criminal law and DUI law firm. He is the highest rated DUI attorney in PA as rated by Avvo.com. Justin McShane is a double Board certified attorney. He is the first and so far the only Pennsylvania attorney to achieve American Bar Association recognized board certification in DUI defense from the National College for DUI Defense, Inc. He is also a Board Certified Criminal Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approved Agency.