Merely Knowing of or Being Around Drugs Doesn’t Prove Possession in Pennsylvania

Drug possession is a serious criminal offense in Pennsylvania, and is punishable by significant fines, imprisonment, and other penalties. In order for a person to be convicted of drug possession with the intent, the prosecution must prove that the person had actual or constructive possession of the controlled substance. In this blog post, we will discuss the differences between actual possession and constructive possession, and explain how merely knowing or being around drugs does not necessarily constitute possession under Pennsylvania law.

Actual possession is the most straightforward form of drug possession. It refers to a situation in which a person has physical control over the controlled substance. For example, if a person has drugs in their hand, that is a perfect example of possession.In order to prove actual possession, the prosecution must show that the defendant had physical possession of the drugs and knew that they were drugs.

Constructive possession, on the other hand, is a more complicated form of drug possession. It refers to a situation in which a person does not have physical possession of the controlled substance, but still has control over it. In order to prove constructive
possession, the prosecution must show that the defendant had knowledge of the presence of the drugs and had the ability to exercise control over them. In other words, the prosecution must prove that the defendant had knowledge and control over the drugs, even if they were not physically in their possession.

Merely knowing or being around drugs does not necessarily constitute possession under Pennsylvania law. For example, if a person is present in a room where drugs are found, but has no knowledge of the drugs or ability to exercise control over them, they are not in possession of the drugs. Similarly, if a person knows that drugs are present but has no control over them, they are not in possession of the drugs.

To illustrate the differences between actual possession and constructive possession, consider the following examples:

Example 1: A person is stopped by police, and a search of their person reveals drugs in their pocket. This person is in actual possession of the drugs, and can be charged with drug possession.

Example 2: A person is driving a car with drugs in the glove compartment in a baggie with their ID and fingerprints are on the inside of the baggie. This person is in constructive possession of the drugs, as they have knowledge of the drugs and the ability to exercise control over them.

Example 3: A person is a passenger in a car where drugs are found in the trunk unbeknownst to that passenger. This person is not in possession of the drugs, as they have no knowledge of the drugs and no ability to exercise control over them.

In conclusion, drug possession is a serious criminal offense in Pennsylvania that requires the prosecution to prove either actual or constructive possession of the controlled substance. Merely knowing or being around drugs does not necessarily constitute possession, and the prosecution must show that the defendant had knowledge and control over the drugs in order to secure a conviction. If you are facing drug possession charges, it is essential to seek the advice of an experienced criminal defense attorney who can help you understand your legal rights and options. A knowledgeable attorney can guide you through the legal process and work to protect your rights and interests throughout the proceedings.

Our Clients are entitled to a Bill of Rights which states:

  • Our clients have the right to expect, we will be proactive in communication. You will hear it from us first. We will return all phone calls, texts and emails promptly.
  • Our clients have the right to expect plain speaking, straight shooting. No B. S.
  • Our clients have the right to expect us to do it right the first time, every time.
  • Our clients have the right to expect us to be on time and professionally prepared for all court appearances, and all meetings.
  • Our clients have the right to expect that they will be fully informed at all times.

This is our promise to you. Call today to get us on your side: (717) 657-3900.

PA DUI attorney Justin J. McShane is the President/CEO of The McShane Firm, LLC - Pennsylvania's top criminal law and DUI law firm. He is the highest rated DUI attorney in PA as rated by Avvo.com. Justin McShane is a double Board certified attorney. He is the first and so far the only Pennsylvania attorney to achieve American Bar Association recognized board certification in DUI defense from the National College for DUI Defense, Inc. He is also a Board Certified Criminal Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approved Agency.