To convict someone of strangulation in Pennsylvania, prosecutors must prove that the defendant knowingly or intentionally impeded another person’s breathing or blood circulation.
While the law focuses on breathing restriction, proving that element in court can be complicated.
Prosecutors often rely on several types of evidence, including:
- Testimony from the alleged victim
- Photographs of injuries
- Medical documentation of symptoms
- Police officer observations
- Body camera recordings
In many cases, the alleged victim may describe sensations such as pressure on the neck, difficulty breathing, or dizziness.
However, strangulation cases do not always involve obvious injuries. Because of that, investigators may treat any physical contact near the neck, collarbone, or upper chest as potential evidence supporting the charge.
Medical evidence can sometimes strengthen the prosecution’s case, particularly when doctors document symptoms associated with restricted blood flow.
At the same time, the absence of medical findings may become an important issue for the defense.
Each case ultimately depends on whether the prosecution can demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that breathing or circulation was actually impeded.
Our Clients are entitled to a Bill of Rights which states:
- Our clients have the right to expect, we will be proactive in communication. You will hear it from us first. We will return all phone calls, texts and emails promptly.
- Our clients have the right to expect plain speaking, straight shooting. No B. S.
- Our clients have the right to expect us to do it right the first time, every time.
- Our clients have the right to expect us to be on time and professionally prepared for all court appearances, and all meetings.
- Our clients have the right to expect that they will be fully informed at all times.
This is our promise to you. Call today to get us on your side: (717) 657-3900.
