In The Press : Com. vs. Wingert

Trial Starts For Man Charged In Rape

The Herald Mail
Thursday May 13, 2004
By Jaime North
Staff Writer

Testimony from a prior rape victim highlighted the prosecutions case Wednesday in the jury trial of a Harrisburg man charged with the attempted rape of a local woman.

Judge Carol L. Van Horn said she anticipates the case against Douglas P. Wingert will go to the jury today.

Wingert, 39, faces five charges stemming from an alleged sexual assault of a 21-year-old woman at knifepoint on May 22, 2003, at the Antrim Mennonite School, 414 Zarger Road in Antrim Township.

Wingert is facing charges of criminal Wingert attempted rape, indecent assault, terroristic threats, unlawful restraint and simple assault.

“My closing argument will show that my client did not have the firm intent to rape in this case, and it’s not supported from any of the witnesses, instances or testimony made today,” said Defense Attorney Justin McShane.

Wednesday’s testimony came from the victim, one witness, two investigating state police officers and testimony from a Harrisburg woman who was raped by Wingert in 1985. In that case, Wingert pleaded guilty to one count of rape and two counts of individual deviate sexual intercourse and served 17 years in a state correctional facility.

The 1985 victim, who was crying and visibly uncomfortable on the stand, testified that Wingert raped her at knifepoint in a wooded area in May 1985 after the two left her friend’s house. The woman was 14 years old at the time.

McShane’s cross-examination centered on the fact that Wingert made verbal commands to that victim and displayed obvious intent in the 1985 incident, something McShane argued that Wingert did not do on May 22, 2003.

According to police reports, Wingert went to the school in search of directions to Keystone Ford, 301 S. Antrim Way, Greencastle, around 5:30 p.m.

The woman, who was carrying items to her car, allowed Wingert to use the phone inside the school, police said. As she continued to load her car, Winged grabbed her when she came back inside and put a carpenter’s knife to her throat, according to police reports.

Wingert led the victim into a neighboring classroom and sexually assaulted her, according to police. The victim was able to break free and run outside the room before Winged tackled her, police said.

“The carpeting had scuff marks in the area where she said she was pinned to the floor,” said Pennsylvania State Trooper Joseph Davidson during testimony. “I felt it was indicative to her allegations.”

As Winged attempted to bind the woman’s hands, she broke free and ran out the door into a neighboring field, according to police. Winged then fled in his delivery truck in the opposite direction, police said.

The woman was picked up by Michelle Masters and her husband as they were driving with their children to a T-ball game along Zarger Road. They took the woman to a neighboring home, where she called her parents.

The woman told police the man who assaulted her was driving a white, boxshaped delivery truck with a business label that was from New Jersey.

Police learned that Keystone Ford receives daily shipments from two companies out of New Jersey when they asked a pads manager, according to Davidson. Police visited Keystone Ford on May 27, 2003, and waited for a delivery truck, Trooper Daren Hockenberry said during testimony. Police made contact with Wingert, who initially denied any involvement but later changed his story, according to Hockenberry.

“He seemed very nervous and kept asking me what I was doing,” Hockenberry said. Wingert was placed in the area of the school through his delivery log book police received from his supervisor with Paul MacHenry & Co., Moorestown, N.J., Hockenberry said.

The woman positively identified Wingert from a photo line-up and identified the truck he was driving from a Polaroid photo of the delivery truck Hockenberry took during his meeting with Winged at Keystone Ford.

“Once the troopers learned of my client’s past record, they developed an unjust conclusion on him,’ McShane said.

Police arrested Wingert on June 11 while he was making a delivery at Keystone Ford.

After Van Horn released the jury, McShane asked the judge to reverse a preliminary hearing decision to exclude potential testimony from Wingert’s girlfriend and allow her to take the stand Thursday.

The judge listened to roughly two minutes of closed-door testimony from Wingert’s girlfriend on the couple’s sexual relations.

McShane said the testimony proved evidence that Wingert showed no intention to have intercourse with the victim. Assistant District Attorney Nancy Meyers argued that the testimony only proved evidence for consensual intercourse, not nonconsensual intercourse.

“We would be comparing apples to oranges here,” Meyers said. “We’re talking about two different things. Rape is not consensual.”

Van Horn denied McShane’s request.

Wingert has been held at the Franklin County Prison in lieu of $100,000 since June 11.


‹ Back to Com. vs. Wingert

Click To Call
Free Consultation Form

Use this form to tell us about your case. One of our experienced attorneys will contact you immediately.





Testimonials

I endorse this lawyer’s work. I have known Justin now for a while, and while I agree he might want to do something about his picture I can say with great enthusiasm he is one of the most motivated and detailed lawyers I know. He is constantly pushing himself and his team forward in the unending quest for legal knowledge; not only does he attend continuing education seminars regularly but he provides the same training for his people. Additionally, he puts on his own seminars for the benefit of other lawyers. He is very well versed and aggressive. Excellent choice.

- Attorney Bruce Robinson, Baltimore MD

Justin is one of the most creative and well prepared lawyers that I know. Whenever I have a complex legal question, Justin is one of the guys I go to first. Good friend, Great lawyer.

- Robert Leonard, Owner, Leonard, Rickman & Holloway, P.C.

Justin brings a yearning to succeed to the table as a criminal defense attorney. He trains himself and his staff attorneys at the highest level to be ready to attack any flaw in the State’s case or any prevarication by a police officer who guesses that Justin will not have found the “smoking gun” in the case. This pride of preparation is not something that can be taught to a trial lawyer —- it is self-generated. Justin has earned my endorsement through hard work and dogged determination to be the best attorney in Pennsylvania.

- Attorney William Head, Atlanta GA
more testimonials »

Click here for What Everyone Should Know about DUI

Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested

Your DUI Attorney Choice By the Numbers

Number of attorneys in the world
1,600,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in the US
1,250,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in Pennsylvania
43,000
Of those, members of the National Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
204
Of those, members of the Pennsylvania Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL)
101
Of those, members of National College for DUI Defense
13
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training as Instructors in Standard Field Sobriety Testing as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who are a Certified Breath Alcohol Test Technician as recognized by the Department of Transportation
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training in Drugs that Impair Driving (Drug Recognition Expert training) as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who is certified as a Phlebotomist (drawing and analysis of blood samples)
2
(of which Attorney McShane is one)
Of those, who is a 2-time graduate and case presenter at the National Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar?
1 - Attorney McShane

Your choice is clear: The McShane Firm, LLC