In The Press : Com. vs. Wholaver

Man Pleads Guilty To Helping Brother Kill Family

The Patriot News
Thursday June 12, 2003
By Marc Levy
The Associated Press

When a central Pennsylvania man goes on trial in the Christmas Eve slayings of his wife and two daughters, his younger brother will likely testify that he drove him to and from the scene of the crime, and later led authorities to the murder weapon hidden in the woods.

In exchange for that cooperation, Scott Wholaver will spend as much as 25 years in prison as a result of a plea bargain approved Thursday in Dauphin County Court by Judge John F. Cherry.

“He is very saddened by these tragic events,’ his attorney, Justin McShane, told reporters. ‘These were his nieces and his sister-in-law.”

Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty against Ernest R. Wholaver Jr. for allegedly shooting his estranged wife, Jean Wholaver, 43, and their two daughters, Elizabeth, 15, and Victoria, 20, at the family’s Middletown home because, according to prosecutors, his daughters were about to testify that he sexually abused them. On Christmas Day, police found Victoria’s 9-month-old daughter physically unharmed, crying next to her mother’s body.

Dressed in jeans and a T-shirt and shackled at his hands and feet, Scott Wholaver, 28, quietly repeated the word “guilty” when asked by a prosecutor how he pleaded to three counts of third-degree murder and one count each of burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary.

He was sentenced on one murder count and will be sentenced later on the other counts, McShane said. If he cooperates, the sentences on the other counts would run concurrently to the sentence he received Thursday so that he would serve no more than 25 years in prison, and as little as 12 1/2 years.

His older brother’s troubles do not end with the murder charges.

Ernest Wholaver, 43, was also accused last month of trying to hire a hit man while in prison to frame the father of Victoria’s child for the murders. The plan, authorities said, was to have the father murdered in a manner that looked as though he had committed suicide out of remorse for the December slayings.

Wholaver was charged with a single count of criminal solicitation to commit murder last month. Prosecutors entered an innocent plea on his behalf.

Prosecutors say they believe Wholaver killed his wife and daughters to eliminate the witnesses against him in a pending trial in which he was accused of molesting the girls.

Wholaver has pleaded innocent to the murder charges. A trial is scheduled for Sept. 8, and prosecutors hope to also press the criminal solicitation charge in that same proceeding.

His attorney, Spero T. Lappas, is seeking to have Scott Wholaver’s testimony kept out of a trial and said he keeps changing his story.

Scott Wholaver “is incapable of telling a consistent story because he is incapable of telling a true story,” Lappas told reporters.

But McShane, Scott Wholaver’s attorney, said his client’s story has remained consistent and detailed through 10 to 15 hours of interrogation by authorities.

During a February preliminary hearing in the case, Scott Wholaver testified that he drove his brother 100 miles from their parents’ home in Saint Benedict to Jean’s home on the night of the killings, supposedly so that his brother could retrieve his pet puppy.

Ernest Wholaver donned dark clothes, a hunting mask and two pairs of gloves, and returned to the parked truck a block away five or 10 minutes later in a “shaking, nervous” state, he testified.

Scott Wholaver also led police to a .22-caliber revolver in the woods of Clearfield County that prosecutors say may have been used to commit the murders. Police said the victims all were killed with .22-caliber slugs.


‹ Back to Com. vs. Wholaver

Click To Call
Free Consultation Form

Use this form to tell us about your case. One of our experienced attorneys will contact you immediately.





Testimonials

Justin’s dedication to and expertise in the defense of those accused of driving while under the influence is respected by lawyers from across the country. When these lawyers have a question about matters of science and the law, Justin is a reliable and ready resource. Client’s can trust that he will provide the best defense possible. I recommend him without reservation.

- Bruce Tarbox, Owner, Bruce Tarbox, P.C.

Dear Justin,

I want to sincerely thank you for your incredible honesty, integrity, and professionalism in the case of my DUI back in February, 2009.

After my arrest on December 29, 2007 you have given my case the care and respect beyond what any other attorney wanted to give me. After the initial meeting with you I was impressed so much that I actually could not believe what I was hearing. You described how you would go about handling my case and described to me what no other attorney could describe because of their lack of knowledge and experience in this field. I had sat down with two other attorney’s in the DUI field and came out in a very depressed state. The first attorney told me to just plead guilty, the other attorney said for $500 he would take care of my case. He never said exactly how or what he would do for me.

When I sat down with you Mr. McShane you told me how this was my livelyhood, I realize even more today how important it was, I could never have worked with another trucking company or any other job of any meaning if I would have been convicted of DUI, for that matter I would had lost my job of $23 per hour driving truck. It was your persistence and determination to see to that I was found NOT GUILTY. I had been to the Dauphin County Courthouse over 7 times, due to the fact that the police department would not bring evidence and or police officers who were required to appear and either or the evidence or the police officers would not show up. If it weren’t for your persistence in filing motions in the court for this evidence and or police officers named this case would have went to trial and I would have been found GUILTY. Many times I was about to give up when you explained to me that could give up, but that you had felt had a solid case and if I did what you had asked of me that you felt with an 80 to 90% confidence, I would be found NOT GUILTY.

Your professionalism, knowledge of all the equipment involved in a DUI, your expert witnesses, and the handling of the entire case is something to be added to the law books. In fact I think it was mentioned that this case is a break through in many way's and that it will go down in case law? I have even went under my name in [Google] and have found the case.

I have not thanked you enough and I cannot thank you enough or express my deepest thanks not only to you, but to your entire staff! The professionalism, knowledge, experience and caring of your staff is second to none!

With my warmest regards,
-Paul L. Kaylor

- Paul L. Kaylor, Harrisburg

Justin is one of the most creative and well prepared lawyers that I know. Whenever I have a complex legal question, Justin is one of the guys I go to first. Good friend, Great lawyer.

- Robert Leonard, Owner, Leonard, Rickman & Holloway, P.C.
more testimonials »

Click here for What Everyone Should Know about DUI

Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested

Your DUI Attorney Choice By the Numbers

Number of attorneys in the world
1,600,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in the US
1,250,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in Pennsylvania
43,000
Of those, members of the National Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
204
Of those, members of the Pennsylvania Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL)
101
Of those, members of National College for DUI Defense
13
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training as Instructors in Standard Field Sobriety Testing as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who are a Certified Breath Alcohol Test Technician as recognized by the Department of Transportation
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training in Drugs that Impair Driving (Drug Recognition Expert training) as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who is certified as a Phlebotomist (drawing and analysis of blood samples)
2
(of which Attorney McShane is one)
Of those, who is a 2-time graduate and case presenter at the National Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar?
1 - Attorney McShane

Your choice is clear: The McShane Firm, LLC