Jury Gets Case In Slaying Near Lake

The Patriot News
December 14, 2004
By Pete Shellem
of The Patriot News

A Dauphin County jury this morning will resume deliberating the fates of two admitted drug dealers accused of killing an addict who had stolen heroin from them four years ago.

GIenn D. Taylor, 43, of Arrow Road, and Mwandishi G, Mitchell, 31, of the 100 block of South 14th Street, are charged with murder, kidnapping and conspiracy in the Nov. 1, 2000, shooting of Haydee Freytes, 23, near Italian Lake.

After closing arguments yesterday, jurors deliberated for less than two hours before Judge Lawrence F. Clark Jr. sent them home shortly before 9:30 p.m.

In the closing arguments, attorneys for Mitchell and Taylor picked away at the testimony of the state’s key witness, a prostitute and former drug addict who said she was present when Freytes was killed.

They said the woman, whose name in being withheld by The Patriot-News, was lying to save herself from a lengthy jail stay.

Justin McShane, representing Taylor, said the woman was not at the scene.

He said he believes police and prosecutors didn’t believe her story either, because they took more than a year to make the arrest after she first told her story.

McShane noted that two other people she claimed were in the car with the defendants and Freytes on the night Freytes died were not charged.

The woman claims she was picked up by Mitchell and Taylor on the evening of Oct. 31, 2000 and they asked her where they could find Freytos.

She said they picked up Preytes along Third Street and drove to Italian Lake with two other people in the car. Mitchell and Taylor began beating Freytes, she said, and then dragged her from the car. She said she heard shots as she fled.

McShane and Mitchell’s attorney, Sanford Krevsky, attacked her story, pointing out that the informant didn’t tell police about the slaying until April 29, 2002, when she was incarcerated on parole violations.

Her description of the assault didn’t match forensic evidence that showed no bruising on Freytes’ face, the defense lawyers argued. Furthermore, she said Freytes was wearing a yellow floral sun dress, when in fact she was wearing jeans and a dark sweatshirt, they said.

First Assistant District Attorney Francis T. Chardo said the witness may have been wrong on some details, but would not have made up the whole story.

He charged that Freytes had refused to pay for $100 worth of heroin sold to her by Mitchell. Taylor sold the drug through Mitchell, according to testimony.

Chardo presented testimony that Freytes refused to pay her debt and ridiculed both men.

“The theft alone may not have been enough of a motive to kill her, but it was compounded by her defiance,” Chardo told the jury.

Two witnesses said Taylor was at a Halloween party at their house on the night of the slaying, but neither could account for his whereabouts after 11 p.m. Freytes died around 2 am.

In an unusual twist yesterday, Clark allowed a convicted-crack cocaine dealer to testify for the defense as an expert witness on the lucrative but dangerous trade of street-level drug dealing.

James D. Buckner, who twice has been convicted of drug-related offenses in Dauphin County, explained to jurors how the drug “industry standard” dictated that dealers who get ripped off learn to limit their responses unless they want to incur the unwanted attention of local law enforcement.

Chardo questioned whether drug dealers entertained any sort of “industry standard” at all.

“You don’t have monthly meetings to discuss what the industry standards should be, do you?” Chardo asked.

‹ Back to Press

Click To Call

Contact Form

Testimonials

I met Justin through the National College for DUI Defense and attended the most advanced DUI blood testing seminar in the country with him. He is one of the most intelligent and innovative DUI attorneys I have ever met. I would send a family member to him for representation without hesitation. And, as a former DUI police officer, DUI defense investigator, DUI prosecutor, and DUI defense attorney, I know a LOT of DUI attorneys. He’s the best!

- Attorney Gary Pirosko, Denver CO

Justin is a serious attorney who understands and empathicizes with the clients he represents. He studies the law and criminal trial practice techniques continuously. His level of dedication to knowing any and every angle for winning his clients’ cases is refreshing, especially when I see so many attorneys ready to plead their clients guilty at the first court appearance. For an attorney in the first decade of law practice, I don’t know how any Pennsylvania attorney could be better prepared for handling DUI and criminal matters than Justin. He walks the walk and talks the talk — of acquittal.

- Attorney William C. Head, Senior Partner, Head, Thomas, Webb & Willis, LLC

I met David at a Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar in California. David works for a firm with a reputation for vigorously fighting and winning tough DWI/DUI cases in Pennsylvania. David was very enthusiastic about DUI defense and was very attentive ot the materials presented during this 3.5 day course taught by doctors, toxicologists, and chemists. David was also happy to speak about trial tips and tactics he has employed and was very passionate about the defense of his clients. Though I only recently met Daivd, I would recommend him as a DUI lawyer committed to fighting the difficult case.

- Attorney Cory Yager, Atlanta GA

more testimonials »

Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested

Your DUI Attorney Choice By the Numbers

Number of attorneys in the world
1,600,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in the US
1,250,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in Pennsylvania
43,000
Of those, members of the National Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
204
Of those, members of the Pennsylvania Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL)
101
Of those, members of National College for DUI Defense
13
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training as Instructors in Standard Field Sobriety Testing as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who are a Certified Breath Alcohol Test Technician as recognized by the Department of Transportation
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training in Drugs that Impair Driving (Drug Recognition Expert training) as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who is certified as a Phlebotomist (drawing and analysis of blood samples)
2
(of which Attorney McShane is one)
Of those, who is a 2-time graduate and case presenter at the National Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar?
1 – Attorney McShane

Your choice is clear: The McShane Firm, LLC