Judge Refuses To Dismiss Rape Charges

District Attorney's office questioned over circumstances of meeting with valley tow-truck driver

The Daily Local
March 2, 2007
By R. Johnathan Tuleya

Mark Ethan McFall described on Friday a meeting he had months ago with authorities during which he said he offered to be a snitch against “politicians and high-ranking officials” in the county.

McFall, the 42-year-old Valley tow-truck driver accused of drugging and sexually assaulting four former employees, declined to name names from the witness stand, however “I work with those people every day. We had the police impound for 15 years. I know most of the politicians through my work,” said the defendant as an offer of proof that he actually had incriminating information.

McFall is charged with multiple counts of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, sexual assault, unauthorized administration of an intoxicant and related charges.

His testimony was part of a hearing about a defense motion seeking to dismiss the charges against him, or remove the Chester County District Attorney’s Office as the prosecuting agency and replace it with the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office.

Defense attorney Justin J. McShane filed the request to dismiss the charges on Monday based on a meeting McFall had with prosecutors and state police in July at the district attorney’s office. It took place without his attorney at the time, John Lachall, present, and McShane argued that constituted prosecutorial misconduct.

Friday afternoon, after nearly two days of testimony, Common Pleas Court Judge Phyllis Streitel refused to dismiss the charges or reassign the case to the state, but not before questioning the practices of the district attorney’s office.

While Chief Deputy District Attorney Robert L. Miller argued McFall had been brought to his office because he had indicated he wanted to cooperate with investigators in hopes of getting a better deal in his own cases against him, Streitel said the fact that McFall sat in the meeting wearing handcuffs and leg irons may have suggested a different purpose.

“That’s what it really is all about,” the judge said. “The fact that you are holding him on four cases and you remind him these are the charges (against him).

“Why were there comments made to him about having to get another attorney?” Streitel said. “It seems to me it was all quite a bit about the four cases.”

Miller said alleged evidence against the defendant was not discussed at the time.

Deputy District Attorney Steve Kelly testified on Thursday that he had suggested to McFall that if he wanted to cooperate he had to hire a new attorney from outside Chester County because of a conflict with his former attorney, Lachall.

Kelly said the defendant had reached out to him to set up the July meeting, but the prosecutor did not name who McFall apparently had been willing to cooperate against. “The targets he was suggesting, some were connected to his former attorney,” Kelly said. “He had my interest.”

Miller said on Friday, “In a case as serious as this, it is going to have to be serious information.”

When Streitel ruled against McFall in the motion, her comments were brief, and she referred to a memo Miller had submitted 15 minutes earlier citing case law about attorney rules of conduct.

Present at the July meeting with McFall were Assistant District Attorney Andrew Rongaus, who is prosecuting the defendant’s cases; Deputy District Attorney Steve Kelly; and two members of the Pennsylvania State Police.

McFall spent more than an hour on the witness stand, but he and McShane were careful not to elicit any testimony that would open the defendant to questioning about the alleged evidence in the case.

The closest he came was at one point when McFall asserted the charges against him in one case were bogus because the sexual encounter with the alleged victim was “consensual.”

A week ago, Streitel revoked McFall’s bail after she learned the defendant had violated the terms of his release when he tried to meet with a man subpoenaed to be a grand jury witness on Nov. 16.

McFall, who owns McFall’s Towing on the 1100 block of West Lincoln Highway, had been free on $400,000 cash bail, and though he wore an ankle bracelet to keep tabs in his whereabouts, he was allowed to continue towing cars between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.

There are four open cases against the defendant, and similar allegations from a fifth alleged victim in Brigantine, N.J.

Pennsylvania State Police first arrested the defendant on Nov. 22, 2005, in connection with the assault of a former 19-year-old male employee that reportedly took place two weeks earlier.

That alleged victim told police McFall had given him a pill when he complained to his boss about feeling ill. After taking the drug, the victim lost consciousness and awoke to find McFall performing a sexual act on him, according to police reports.

Investigators later executed search warrants at McFall’s towing company and reportedly seized more than 100 bottles of pills, digital nude photographs of the 19-year-old victim, and floppy disks that contained two videos of the defendant allegedly assaulting another man, police said.

McFall is a former South Coatesville police officer.

‹ Back to Press

Click To Call

Contact Form

Testimonials

Justin McShane is quickly gaining a national reputation as an outstanding criminal defense attorney. Regardless of the charge, Justin is a true champion for his clients, even achieving results many other more seaseoned attorneys would find almost impossible. I cannot recomend Justin highly enough. If I were charged with a DUI in Pennsylvania, Justin would be the first lawyer I called.

- Attorney Theodore Vosk, Bellvue WA

I have had the pleasure to closely observe Attorney McShane, and have assisted him in a matter. He is one of the most dedicated and prepared attorney’s I have observed in my fifteen years in practice. He is absolutely dedicated to his clients. One of the VERY BEST.

- Attorney Richard Kodzis, Millersville MD

Dear Justin,

I want to sincerely thank you for your incredible honesty, integrity, and professionalism in the case of my DUI back in February, 2009.

After my arrest on December 29, 2007 you have given my case the care and respect beyond what any other attorney wanted to give me. After the initial meeting with you I was impressed so much that I actually could not believe what I was hearing. You described how you would go about handling my case and described to me what no other attorney could describe because of their lack of knowledge and experience in this field. I had sat down with two other attorney’s in the DUI field and came out in a very depressed state. The first attorney told me to just plead guilty, the other attorney said for $500 he would take care of my case. He never said exactly how or what he would do for me.

When I sat down with you Mr. McShane you told me how this was my livelyhood, I realize even more today how important it was, I could never have worked with another trucking company or any other job of any meaning if I would have been convicted of DUI, for that matter I would had lost my job of $23 per hour driving truck. It was your persistence and determination to see to that I was found NOT GUILTY. I had been to the Dauphin County Courthouse over 7 times, due to the fact that the police department would not bring evidence and or police officers who were required to appear and either or the evidence or the police officers would not show up. If it weren’t for your persistence in filing motions in the court for this evidence and or police officers named this case would have went to trial and I would have been found GUILTY. Many times I was about to give up when you explained to me that could give up, but that you had felt had a solid case and if I did what you had asked of me that you felt with an 80 to 90% confidence, I would be found NOT GUILTY.

Your professionalism, knowledge of all the equipment involved in a DUI, your expert witnesses, and the handling of the entire case is something to be added to the law books. In fact I think it was mentioned that this case is a break through in many way’s and that it will go down in case law? I have even went under my name in [Google] and have found the case.

I have not thanked you enough and I cannot thank you enough or express my deepest thanks not only to you, but to your entire staff! The professionalism, knowledge, experience and caring of your staff is second to none!

With my warmest regards,
-Paul L. Kaylor

- Paul L. Kaylor, Harrisburg

more testimonials »

Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested

Your DUI Attorney Choice By the Numbers

Number of attorneys in the world
1,600,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in the US
1,250,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in Pennsylvania
43,000
Of those, members of the National Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
204
Of those, members of the Pennsylvania Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL)
101
Of those, members of National College for DUI Defense
13
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training as Instructors in Standard Field Sobriety Testing as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who are a Certified Breath Alcohol Test Technician as recognized by the Department of Transportation
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training in Drugs that Impair Driving (Drug Recognition Expert training) as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who is certified as a Phlebotomist (drawing and analysis of blood samples)
2
(of which Attorney McShane is one)
Of those, who is a 2-time graduate and case presenter at the National Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar?
1 – Attorney McShane

Your choice is clear: The McShane Firm, LLC