Driver is acquitted of assault on trooper

The Lower Frankford man was accused of trying to run over the officer, who shot him during a chase. But he is convicted of lesser charges in the incident.

The Patriot-News
August 11, 2009
By Matt Miller
Of The Patriot News

Joshua Grimes didn’t say a word in his defense, but a Cumberland County jury acquitted him Tuesday of charges that he tried to run over a state trooper who shot Grimes after a chase in November.

The jury deliberated about three hours before deciding Grimes wasn’t guilty of aggravated assault or simple assault on Trooper Rodney Fink.

The charges were the most serious filed against Grimes, 27, of Lower Frankford Twp., and a conviction could have sent him to state prison.

So Grimes had cause to smile even though the jury convicted him of lesser counts of fleeing police, reckless endangerment and resisting arrest. President Judge Edgar B. Bayley acquitted him of drunken driving.

Grimes’ mother whispered “Yes!” as the acquittals on the assault counts came down, but declined comment later.

*The jurors apparently agreed with defense attorney Tim Barrouk that Grimes was trying to escape but wasn’t trying to harm anyone during the 10-minute chase.*

Police said Grimes tried to back over Fink after the trooper rammed Grimes’ Ford Explorer off the road at the end of a pursuit. The chase began when Fink saw Grimes speeding and driving erratically on Route 11 in West Pennsboro Twp.

*”I think the jury got it right. [Grimes] said from the beginning that he never meant to hurt the officer,” Barrouk said.*

*Barrouk didn’t call any witnesses during the two-day trial.*

*Barrouk didn’t rule out the possibility of filing suit against police challenging whether the shooting was justified, but said that until now Grimes has focused on the criminal case.*

In December, District Attorney David Freed ruled that Fink acted correctly in shooting Grimes.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Michelle Sibert said she was disappointed with the acquittals on the assault charges.

She insisted that Grimes knew Fink was behind his vehicle and surely would have run over and killed or severely injured him had the officer not lunged out of the way.

Fink told the jury that after the ramming he was out of his cruiser and behind the Explorer when Grimes suddenly backed toward him. Fink said he dodged and fired three times, hitting Grimes once in the chest.

Grimes has been in county prison since his release from the hospital in January.

Sibert said a time-served jail sentence is possible when Bayley sentences Grimes in October.

‹ Back to Press

Click To Call

Contact Form

Testimonials

I have had the opportunity to meet and discuss DUI/DWI issues with Justin at several advanced level DUI/DWI seminars. Justin is very knowledgable in the field of DUI/DWI law and is very passionate about defending his clients. Justin is always willing to share his ideas and he is a leader in the DUI/DWI industry.

- Attorney Cory Yager, Associate Attorney, Head, Thomas, Webb, & Willis LLP

Justin’s encyclopedia of scientific defenses is impressive. But even more impressive is his ability to explain those defenses to juries in plain English! He is a DUI warrior; and I would not hestitate to recommend him to a family member or friend in need.

- Attorney Karen Missimer, Glendale WI

With any guilty verdict on any charge I would have been given 20 months of back time in a PA DOC Facility. Your firm gave me another chance. I will recommend you to anyone who wants their own second chance.

- BS – Harrisburg

more testimonials »

Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested

Your DUI Attorney Choice By the Numbers

Number of attorneys in the world
1,600,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in the US
1,250,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in Pennsylvania
43,000
Of those, members of the National Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
204
Of those, members of the Pennsylvania Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL)
101
Of those, members of National College for DUI Defense
13
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training as Instructors in Standard Field Sobriety Testing as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who are a Certified Breath Alcohol Test Technician as recognized by the Department of Transportation
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training in Drugs that Impair Driving (Drug Recognition Expert training) as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who is certified as a Phlebotomist (drawing and analysis of blood samples)
2
(of which Attorney McShane is one)
Of those, who is a 2-time graduate and case presenter at the National Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar?
1 – Attorney McShane

Your choice is clear: The McShane Firm, LLC