In The Press

At The McShane Firm, we know that potential clients like to see cases handled by our firm, so we’ve compiled a collection of articles detailing some of the more high-profile cases handled by The McShane Firm, LLC, Law Offices. For more information about our firm and how you can fight DUI cases and more, contact us.

Jury Acquits Man of Robbing Drug Informant

Attorney Justin McShane secured a full acquittal on all charges against the accused even though there was a videotape of the alleged robbery with three Pennsylvania State Police eyewitnesses. After which an experienced prosecutor indicated that made it so he could not sleep at night.

Com vs. Pittman (The Passenger Side DUI)

In December of 2005, Derek R. Pittman was charged with a DUI in Pennsylvania while briefly steering from the passenger’s seat of a sober friend’s car. Attorney Justin McShane successfully defended Mr. Pittman with a result that lead to dismissal and expungement of the charges of Driving Under the Influence. This case received national exposure.

Com. vs. Prendergast

On March 22, 2002, Brian A. Prendergast was accused of assaulting a woman in the parking lot of the Harrisburg East Mall. Attorney Justin McShane successfully defended Prendergast arguing for a Not Guilty on the only contested charge which was kidnapping. This saved Mr. Prendergast from several more years of incarceration and Megan’s Law lifetime reporting requirements.

Com vs. Sawyer

In a brutal homicide case where Sawyer was accused of stabbing one of his best friends over forty times, Attorney Justin McShane argued successfully to have a damming confession linking him to the crime suppressed by the Court of Common Pleas. This legal ruling was so damaging to the Commonwealth’s case that the Commonwealth decided to appeal the case.

Com. vs. Scott Wholaver (a.k.a. “Middletown Christmas Eve Triple Homicide”)

On the early morning of December 24, 2002, Earnest Wholaver and brother Scott Wholaver journeyed to Middletown, PA where Earnest snuck into the home of his estranged wife, murdering her and two of their children while a unknowing Scott waited outside. Attorney Justin McShane defended Scott Wholaver on three counts of Homicide, Conspiracy to Commit Burglary in a case where his brother ultimately received the death penalty.

Com. vs. Swartz

On November 24th, 2004, Dustin Swartz of Port Royal, along with three other accomplices, staged a daring armed robbery of a Weis Supermarket in Juniata County. Attorney Justin McShane defended Swartz on charges of robbery, two counts each of robbery of a motor vehicle, kidnapping, burglary, theft, receiving stolen property, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and firearms not to be carried without a license.

Com. vs. Taylor

On November 1st, 2001, Glenn Darien Taylor was accused of kidnapping a city woman, shooting her to death, and leaving her body near Italian Lake. Attorney Justin McShane defended Taylor on charges of murder, kidnapping, and other counts. Taylor was found not guilty of First Degree Murder.

Com. vs. Wingert

On May 22nd, 2003, convicted rapist Douglas Wingert was accused of trying to rape a teacher at knifepoint at a private school in Antrim Township. Attorney Justin McShane defended Wingert on charges of Criminal Attempted Rape, Indecent Assault, and Unlawful Restraint.

Judge Throws out Criminal Charges Against Pair Accused of Making Threats

Intimidation Charges Dropped

Attorney Justin McShane successfully defended a federal police officer accused of
Official Oppression and another person accused of Victim/Witness Intimidation. All charges were thrown out of Court after the Commonwealth presented its case. Although it was a Jury trial, the Judge was convinced after the cross-examination of Attorney McShane that the evidence was woefully insufficient and did not even let the Jury deliberate on the case at all, resulting in a Not Guilty verdict.

Miscellaneous Cases

Click To Call

Contact Form

Testimonials

Justin’s dedication to and expertise in the defense of those accused of driving while under the influence is respected by lawyers from across the country. When these lawyers have a question about matters of science and the law, Justin is a reliable and ready resource. Client’s can trust that he will provide the best defense possible. I recommend him without reservation.

- Bruce Tarbox, Owner, Bruce Tarbox, P.C.

Justin is a serious attorney who understands and empathicizes with the clients he represents. He studies the law and criminal trial practice techniques continuously. His level of dedication to knowing any and every angle for winning his clients’ cases is refreshing, especially when I see so many attorneys ready to plead their clients guilty at the first court appearance. For an attorney in the first decade of law practice, I don’t know how any Pennsylvania attorney could be better prepared for handling DUI and criminal matters than Justin. He walks the walk and talks the talk — of acquittal.

- Attorney William C. Head, Senior Partner, Head, Thomas, Webb & Willis, LLC

Justin McShane is quickly gaining a national reputation as an outstanding criminal defense attorney. Regardless of the charge, Justin is a true champion for his clients, even achieving results many other more seaseoned attorneys would find almost impossible. I cannot recomend Justin highly enough. If I were charged with a DUI in Pennsylvania, Justin would be the first lawyer I called.

- Attorney Theodore Vosk, Bellvue WA

more testimonials »

Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)

Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested

Your DUI Attorney Choice By the Numbers

Number of attorneys in the world
1,600,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in the US
1,250,000
Of those, the number of attorneys in Pennsylvania
43,000
Of those, members of the National Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
204
Of those, members of the Pennsylvania Association Criminal Defense Lawyers (PACDL)
101
Of those, members of National College for DUI Defense
13
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training as Instructors in Standard Field Sobriety Testing as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who are a Certified Breath Alcohol Test Technician as recognized by the Department of Transportation
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who received training in Drugs that Impair Driving (Drug Recognition Expert training) as recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5
(of which we are 4)
Of those, who is certified as a Phlebotomist (drawing and analysis of blood samples)
2
(of which Attorney McShane is one)
Of those, who is a 2-time graduate and case presenter at the National Forensic Blood and Urine Seminar?
1 – Attorney McShane

Your choice is clear: The McShane Firm, LLC