A: Pennsylvania faced with the prospect of losing lucrative federal highway funding on the 11th hour enacted legislation repealing the old DUI statute which would have been found under Section 3731 of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code (Title 75), in favor a very complicated progressive recidivist multi-tiered model of criminal liability for the offense of Impaired Driving. Since the 2004 enactment of the new "DUI" law now re-codified in the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code (Title 75) section 3802 et seq. entitled "Driving After Imbibing", the Pennsylvania legislature has sub-divided the "new" DUI into 4 basic categories:
First is the "incapable of safe driving" subsection which has no attachment to a particular BAC level, but requires instead that the Commonwealth prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of driving that the person was substantially impaired by either controlled substances or alcohol or a combination of both to a degree that they were rendered incapable of safe driving. The substantial impairment must be to the essential safe operation of the vehicle and not to tangential peripheral matters. The person's purported BAC level is but a factor that the Jury or Judge may consider but arises no presumption under the law.
The second subsection is the per se DUI offense levels. A per se statute such as Pennsylvania means that even absent of any sort of evidence of impairment (meaning you could be 100% fully functioning both cognitively and physically), you may be held criminally culpable simply by driving within two (2) hours and having beyond a statutorily prohibited level of alcohol in either your breath (BrAC) or blood (BAC). This per se level is further divided into 3 tiers: General Impairment, High and Highest. There are specialized per se levels depending upon certain circumstances such as the class of driver (CDL driver in a commercial vehicle, bus driver) or age.
The third subsection is to DUI with controlled substances (Driving under the Influence-Drugs, DUID) in that as the statute itself reads, you may not have any level of a controlled substance in your system while driving. Just like the alcohol per se law as mentioned above, this is independent of your level of impairment. Simply having the metabolites in your system and driving, if proven beyond a reasonable doubt, can lead to a conviction. For DUID, although the statute prohibits any amount, the Department of Health has established minimum threshold levels and publishes a schedule of them in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
The final subsection is if you are found to be under the influence of a combination of both drugs and alcohol to a degree that you are incapable of safe driving (as defined above).
Justin’s encyclopedia of scientific defenses is impressive. But even more impressive is his ability to explain those defenses to juries in plain English! He is a DUI warrior; and I would not hestitate to recommend him to a family member or friend in need.
Justin, and his firm, offer well-reasoned and strong defenses for their clients. Justin will be a strong advocate for his clients, and will argue tenaciously in court. Justin has a strong knowledge of the science of breath alcohol testing, and has spend a great deal of time and money bettering his understanding, and the understanding of his associates, in the intricacies of alcohol testing.

S.R. - Posession with Intent to Deliver - All Charges Dropped

E.O. Harrisburg - DUI High Rate

DA - Harrisburg - Revocation Hearing

EG - Harrisburg - Obstruction of Justice

BS - Harrisburg, Delivery of Controlled Substance
Click here for What Everyone Should Know about DUI
Click here for the Top 10 DUI mistakes (and how to avoid them)
Click here for the Top 10 things NOT to do if you're arrested
All contents © 2005-2010 The McShane Firm, LLC Law Offices. All Rights Reserved.